“When liberty comes with hands dabbled in blood it is hard to shake hands with her.”--Oscar Wilde

Thursday, June 30, 2005

Soon, I promise...

Amazing how someone as poor as I am at the moment can feel so rich... All I've done this week is take the twins for ice cream and watch them splash around in their kiddie pool. I haven't even looked at the computer or the paper, or the television. WONDERFUL, WONDERFUL RICHES ABOUND!

Anyway I'll be back this evening (or maybe tomorrow, or maybe this weekend, hard to say) with a post on The Homosexual Agenda--- as described in a free newspaper I picked up this week, and also a comment or two about John Wilcox's response to my CA article... or perhaps I should say Wilcox's list of distortions, semantic quibbles, and misrepresentations. Also a few words about why broadcast media hasn't jumped on this story.

Monday, June 27, 2005

Back from Paradise

Sorry to have gone away for so long without even saying "ta for now." I've been staying in a palatial cabin in Heber Springs, AK "finishing" the yet to be titled West Coast Turnaround CD. Sadly we're still two backing vocals (which I think we can do without) and a mandolin track (which we recorded and somehow lost) away from the finish line.

At any rate I was shocked to discover that our deluxe accommodations on the foggy Little Red did not offer Internet access. I didn't have phone service either. But we did have gumbo, and chicken Colorado, and chorizo & egg tacos with gumbo cheese grits, and decent whiskey, and a round of leftovers, and lamb chops with jerked sweet potato pudding, cucumber salad, roast corn, and lots of Fat Tire beer which is accurately described by the manufacturer as "biscuity."

There's something to be said for being cut off from everything in a remote place where the trees and oxygen are thick and rabbits, and beavers, and armadillos, and songbirds, and hummingbirds, and deer, and Bigfoots are all just hanging out and doing what comes naturally. Porches, rocking chairs, and a mid-day rain to keep it cool--no mosquitoes: This is something like Paradise. And to heap goodie on top of goodie, the recording was good. We slowly went through and hung all the tropes of classic country: Weeping string sections, woozy fiddle solos, gospel harmonies, ear-bruising Telecaster licks. I think this thing may turn out to be not half bad.

I'd expected to have some place to access the web--- I don't know why I thought this. But let me tell you; not looking at a computer screen for two or three days is really, really nice.

This is a warning

I'm on vacation all this week and I may not update much. My eyes have been thanking me.

By the way, is Bush still President? I haven't seen any news since Friday afternoon. Oh, to be ignorant and isolated in the wilderness!

Thursday, June 23, 2005

A moment in the sunshine

I'm not one to go on and on about the power of the blog but Memphis Blogtopia has done a great job in breaking the Love in Action story, getting it picked up by local and national media, and by driving the debate. The most important questions asked have appeared first on blogs by EJ, me, Autoegocrat, Lady Cutiepietroublemaker and on, and on--- and they have moved right into the mainstream news.

Why do I crow?

THIS is why I crow (hat tip to EJ the all knowing)

The state of Tennessee has begun an investigation in response to allegations of child abuse at Love in Action, a Memphis facility that advertises homosexual conversion therapy for adolescents, according to the state department of health.

K. Daniele Edwards, a spokesperson for Child Services at the Tennessee Department of Health, confirmed an investigation is underway but declined to comment on the details. She noted that she presumes the Love in Action program would require licensing by the state.

Love in Action is not licensed by the Tennessee Departments of Health, Mental Health, Human Services, Child Services or Education, according to Rachel Lassiter of Gov. Phil Bredesen's communications office.

This is GREAT NEWS and everybody who kept this story alive online--and the QAC who moved warm bodies to the front--all deserve a toast. So here's to ya fellow travelers!

This is a long way from over but every now and then it's good to recognize little victories.

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

The Fixer

Your honor, the Bush Administration says it would never fix information around a predetermined policy—like the war in Iraq for instance—but I’m here to show you that is simply not the case.

I submit as Exhibit A, this report from Think Progress:

Cattle Grazing: “The Bush administration altered critical portions of a scientific analysis of the environmental impact of cattle grazing on public lands before announcing relaxed grazing limits on those lands, according to scientists involved in the study…conclusions that the proposed rules might adversely affect water quality and wildlife, including endangered species, were excised and replaced with language justifying less-stringent regulations favored by cattle ranchers.”

Hog Farming: Nationally respected Agriculture Department microbiologist Dr. Zahn discovered that hog farms were emitting drug-resistant airborne bacteria that “if breathed by humans, would make them harder to treat when ill. Zahn presented his findings at a scientific conference in 2000, but the Bush administration stopped him from publishing his data 11 times between September 2001 and April 2002, he said. When Danish researchers sought to learn more about his work, Zahn wasn’t allowed to share his techniques.”

Climate Change: “A White House official who once led the oil industry’s fight against limits on greenhouse gases has repeatedly edited government climate reports in ways that play down links between such emissions and global warming, according to internal documents…[The] official, Philip A. Cooney, removed or adjusted descriptions of climate research that government scientists and their supervisors, including some senior Bush administration officials, had already approved. In many cases, the changes appeared in the final reports.”

Air Quality at Ground Zero: “In the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the World Trade Center, the White House instructed the Environmental Protection Agency to give the public misleading information, telling New Yorkers it was safe to breathe when reliable information on air quality was not available. That finding is included in a report released Friday by the Office of the Inspector General of the EPA. It noted that some of the agency’s news releases in the weeks after the attack were softened before being released to the public: Reassuring information was added, while cautionary information was deleted.”

Toxicology of Mercury: “The White House and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) made changes to a report from the National Academy of Sciences on the toxicology of mercury, a powerful neurotoxin that is especially dangerous to pregnant women and young children…White House staff made editorial interventions in the report, which was commissioned by Congress to establish the science on the risks associated with mercury. The White House’s alterations downplayed the risks of mercury, replaced specific enumerations of mercury-related harms with bland, general references, and introduced additional emphasis on uncertainty.”

Effectiveness of Condoms: “The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and USAID have removed or revised fact sheets on condoms, excising information about their effectiveness in disease prevention, and promoting abstinence instead.”

Effects of Oil Drilling on the Arctic Refuge: “Interior Secretary Gale Norton substantially altered biological findings from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concerning effects of oil development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge before she transmitted them to Congress, according to documents released October 19 by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.” In one instance, Norton’s defense was that she “simply made an error in her testimony — saying ‘outside’ when she meant to say ‘inside.’”

Abortion: “The removal from a National Cancer Institute website of a scientific analysis concluding that abortions do not increase a woman’s risk of breast cancer. That move, in November 2002, contradicted the broad medical consensus, and members of Congress protested the change. In response, the NCI updated its website to include the conclusion of a panel of experts that induced abortion is not associated with an increase in breast cancer risk.”

HIV/AIDS: “During the latter half of 2002, the Administration began removing scientific information, relating to the spread of HIV, from government websites, including those of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. Much of the information that was removed contracted [sic] claims made by the administration’s abstinence-only agenda.”

Cancer: Earlier this year, “EPA’s guidelines acknowledge[d], for the first time, that children under 2 years of age are 10 times more likely to get cancer from certain chemicals than adults who are similarly exposed. But the White House Office of Management and Budget undermined that acknowledgment by inserting language in the guidelines that make it easy for industry to block EPA from following them when assessing cancer-causing chemicals.”

Stem Cell Research: “[The] Bush administration dismissed Dr. Elizabeth Blackburn, a leading cell biologist, and Dr. William May, a prominent medical ethicist, from the President’s Council on Bioethics…[Blackburn] was removed from the panel soon after she objected to a Council report on stem cell research. In an essay in the April 1, 2004, issue of The New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Blackburn recounted how the dissenting opinion she submitted, which she believes reflects the scientific consensus in America, was not included in the council’s reports even though she had been told the reports would represent the views of all the council’s members.”

Ground-Water: Vice President Dick Cheney’s old company Halliburton “pioneered” an oil-drilling technique that “can contaminate drinking water supplies with carcinogens and is therefore required by law to be regulated by the EPA.” Halliburton has spent years trying to get the federal government to exempt the technique from environmental regulations.” A senior Environmental Protection Agency recently revealed that “the EPA [initially concluded] that the technique can be dangerous to public health, but then [deleted] the conclusion after Cheney’s office demanded it.” Furthermore, six of the seven EPA panel members who decided that the technique was “safe” had all come from the energy industry.

And of course exhibit B.

Any patterns appearing here? Any M.O.?

Bolton's boys?

On NPR today a Senate Republican--and I can't remember who-- said that if the Bolton vote was a secret ballot Bolton wouldn't get 51 votes. That's begging for some followups.

Would Senate Republicans knowingly send a bad, potentially harmful representative to the UN? Do they serve the President or the people?

and

Who has pictures of who doing what with Jeff Gannon?

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Blogger eating posts?

Okay, my CA labor story is out tomorrow. I posted on it (swear to goodness) and now it's gone.

A simple question

Here's what happens: Somebody in the right wing of the U.S. Government and or military behaves in a way that reminds people of Nazis, or fascists. Somebody on the left wing says, "Hey, that's just like the Nazis, or the Fascists." We are then treated to lecture after lecture about why it's wrong to use these names even if they apply because they refer to HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE events in the past that are beyond compare. The person noting the Naziness is generally brought lower than the person doing things that are Nazi-like.

Okay dipshits, you win. No more Nazi name calling.

What do you think about words like this:

Monster
Sadist
Barbarian
Beast
Brute
Demon
Horror
Devil
Miscreant
Savage
Ogre
Lusus naturae
Hun
Fiend
Gargoyle
Vampire
Troglodyte
Degenerate
Malignancy
Evildoer
Lucifer
Villain
Abnormality
Pervert

or how about...

Corrupt, crafty, criminal, deceitful, devious, dishonest, dishonorable, double-dealing, fraudulent, knavish, lying, nefarious, ruthless, shady, shifty, treacherous, underhand, unlawful, unprincipled, unscrupulous, angry, atrocious, bad, baneful, base, beastly, calamitous, corrupt, damnable, depraved, destructive, disastrous, execrable, foul, harmful, hateful, heinous, hideous, iniquitous, injurious, loathsome, low, maleficent, malevolent, malicious, nefarious, no good, obscene, offensive, pernicious, poison, rancorous, repugnant, repulsive, revolting, sinful, sadistic, spiteful, stinking, ugly, unpleasant, vicious, vile, villainous, wicked, wrathful Americans who are not Nazis but sometimes act like Nazis.

Would that be better?

I've got a more substantial post coming soon, but I promised I'd be back by Tuesday and by God I keep my promises.



Autoegocrat weighs in:



This country is going to go directly to Hell without passing "Go," and all because we were too God-damn polite to stop the killing and torture. Does that sound like any other country you might have heard of?

Saturday, June 18, 2005

Love in Action: a losing battle?

I REALLY shouldn't be blogging, but I couldn't let this tidbit linger. So one more post and then I'm off till Tuesday... unless I backslide again. Please, if this seems like I'm repeating info from previous posts, hang tight. There's a surprise twist!

Why is Love in Action a fight worth the cost of engagement? Because its kid's program Refuge amounts to child abuse that could lead to lingering psychological disability. At least that's the official suggestion of the APA.

For those just tuning in LIA is a ministry/therapy using shaming/brainwashing techniques, and a heavy dose of Jesus to make gay people straight-- or at least "straight-acting". Refuge is its youth camp where parents send their little Sammy Sissies, and Flannel Flos-- often against their will. The program's medical expert is (drumroll) a dentist.

John Smid recently asked critics why they opposed, "appropriate therapeutic intervention for minor children according to SOCIAL and personal conscience," like Nazi Germany never fucking happened. And yeah, I know the Nazi talk makes me sound mighty knee-jerky, but I'm not the one performing backyard brain abortions for the sake of social hegemony.

But let me ask you this... If a respected voice on the most watched news channel in America can say something like this about Gitmo, I think it's fair to say that America is cool with a little parent sanctioned torture. Read these comments from Chris Wallace and weep for what your county has become. As long as we're a little better than the Nazis or the Soviets we're better than the Nazis and Soviets. It curdles the brain. It's one of the single most immoral comments I've heard in a long time.

Wallace on Gitmo:

"There's an allegation of mistreatment. But what the FBI memo alleges, and it is an allegation, is, you know, would be considered a day at the beach in the Soviet gulag or Nazi...I mean, what was so horrific in the memo, and I'm not saying, you know, there aren't legitimate questions there, is that someone is chained to a floor and forced to defecate on themselves, and has loud rock music playing. Excuse me? I mean, you know, Auschwitz? Bergen Belsen? The Soviet gulag? I think they would have been very happy to be allowed to defecate on themselves."

This isn't a man talking it's a sickness. This is a diver in too deep and lost. He can no longer judge up from down, left from right and the oxygen is running out.
That's the voice of a terribly confused and frightened segment of America. In light of this, a question:

Love in Action? Those nineteen year old kids getting razor sharp bamboo shoved up and down their peeholes by Charley would have LOVED some Love in Action. You're not going to compare it to nam, are you? That was REAL abuse. That was REAL torture.

I don't want to hear another war-loving, torture-condoning, fag-bashing, lynch-loving Republican accuse my liberal ass of moral relativism because I didn't experience regicidal outrage over Clinton's bimboholic ways or his trailer park taste for marinated cigars.

Only midday and already too tired to spellcheck...

Friday, June 17, 2005

Weekend Twin Blogging


I'm guessing I won't be blogging again until Tuesday so here's the latest future of Rock and Roll edition.

And if you want to hear some classic Country music my band The West Coast Turnaround is at Automatic Slim's tomorrow night at 10:30. I don't have a poster so here's the set list.

Rednecks White Socks & Blue Ribbon Beer

RING OF FIRE

WILD SIDE OF LIFE/HONKY angel

Lonely Street

Truck Driving Man

Good Girl’s Gonna Go Bad

HEY WAITEr (WCT)

Freightliner Fever

18 Wheeling Man (WCT)

Getting Over You (WCT)

MURDER One (WCT)

Sing Me Back

FOLSOM PRISON BLUES

Crazy

Harper Valley PTA

Walking The Floor

Everybody But You (WCT)

Stand by your man

Luckenbach Texas

Country Death Song (WCT)

Those City Lights (WCT)

HEAVEN’S JUST A SIN AWAY

Coalminer’s Daughter

TIGER BY THE TAIL

YOUR CHEATIN HEART

WORKIN MANS BLUES

Good Hearted Woman (Into whiskey River)

Grand Tour

Something Died (WCT)

Divorce

Pop a top again

Close Don’t Count (Unless it's close to you) (WCT)

Crazy Arms

Mama Tried

2 more bottles of wine

BLUE BAYOU

David Allen Coe (WCT)


Posted by Hello

Thursday, June 16, 2005

Two Questions for John Smid

I can't make the Love In Action press confrence as I'll be working on a labor dispute story Downtown, but the Flyer will be represented. I just wanted to put this post up to draw attention to a post by Autoegocrat that should not be ignored.

The Mudslinger asks two questions:

The first question is one I hinted at in my last post: If you're a clinic, where's your accreditation.

Number 2 is also a Doosey: what if a gay Jew wants to change his life. Does he have to accept Christ?

These are questions that can't, or shouldn't be ignored.

Go visit the Mud Company and give Auto some turkee! Click on the headline to read his well framed questions.

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Unnecessary Surgery: or Killing the queer inside

I don't know how to respond when a group that believes homosexuality is both a psychological abnormality to cure and a sin to wash away asks me to be open minded. It curdles the brain.

Rumor mill says there will be national press. Here's the release with comments to follow.

MEMPHIS, Tennessee, June 15, 2005: Love in Action International, a Christ-centered Memphis-based international recovery treatment center, is calling upon the community to extend open-minded consideration and tolerance towards young people with same-sex attraction who are currently undergoing the organization’s youth program called Refuge.

Controversy over an individual’s right to self-determination and choice in sexuality has recently been the subject of current debate. Also under assault is the right of parents to determine appropriate therapeutic intervention for minor children according to social and personal conscience. Community and youth leaders, as well as individuals, who have been through the Love in Action International program, will address these issues at a press conference being held tomorrow.

Okay, did it really say, "Controversy over an individual’s right to self-determination and choice in sexuality." No they didn't. NO THEY DIDN'T!

They're going to pull the, "person's right to choose card?"

I'm a'flutter!

Next on the menu:
"Also under assault is the right of parents to determine appropriate therapeutic intervention for minor children."

I don't think that's ever been the question. The question is, "is there something wrong with the kid?" Because if the answer is "no" (the medical and mental healthcare communities say no overwhelmingly) then this is an unnecessary surgery. It's like turning little John into little Jane because you always wanted a girl.

And "Therapy?" I think this could be the all important tell: Hey love in action, show us your academic bona fides!

Because-- and I might be wrong here but I don't think I am -- Love in Action is a ministry, not a clinic. John Smid's title is Reverend not Doctor.

Look, if you want to raise your kid to be a niggerjewfag-hating crackerass cracker, that's your business and there's not a thing anybody can do about it and that's how it should be, I fucking guess. But if you get breast implants for your 5-year-old, maybe there's something wrong with YOU. Our children aren't pets and they aren't toys to be neutered or broken for our pleasure.
My guess is that they will be showing off some reformed gays who are "community leaders" which I'm sure means "teaching Sunday school in Mumford."

The most dangerous words of ALL:

"Appropriate therapeutic intervention for minor childrenaccording to social and personal conscience."

Personal conscience? Sure, I suppose. But "Social conscious? That's--- and I hate to say this because it's so overdone---Nazi talk.

Fucking hell.

UPDATE: I can't believe I didn't snark on this the first go round: "
has recently been the subject of current debate."

Recent and current. That is SO "Right now."

Contact

I finally heard from Angelo Corbrasci/Gregory Scott Moore, the founder of the local Conservative group Defenders of Freedom. I've asked him for an interview.

It seems Angelo thinks I called him a terrorist. I did no such thing. I said that his rhetoric was the rhetoric of radical Islam and proposed a little game. I asked him to rewrite a recent e-mail susbtituting Allah for God and Islam'Islamic for Christian, Conservative etc.

By only changing the nouns you get this.

His name is ALLAH. Can you say it?.....Will you say it? We here at the AMERICAN TALIBAN believe in ALLAH, family & an ISLAMIC STATE....In that order. When joining the AMERICAN TALIBAN you are saying that you are a true ISLAMIST, that you will stand up and not compromise your principles. You will never be ashamed of your values. You will proudly say that you are a believer in the KORAN, the TEACHINGS OF MOHAMMED and claim him as PROPHET OF PROPHETS. You will stand strong for family values, love and honor your spouse as well as raise you children with the same ISLAMIC values. You will be active in the MOSQUE as well as politics .You will not follow any Party to the point of voting for someone just because they are a part of a party. You will research the candidates and vote for the most ISLAMIC candidate running. You will become involved in all aspects of politics to see that right triumphs over wrong.

As for me and my house we will serve ALLAH.

I will love, honor and protect my family. I will fight to the death to protect my country against INFIDELS who wish to destroy it from within.

Okay, maybe the "Love & honor your spouse" bit doesn't quite work, but only because of the Western context. In an Islamic context it would have to read "honor my spouse/s by keeping her/them as Allah would have them." Or something like that. But the otherwise I think the point is clear. Basing politics on a narrow view of religion and promising to fight to the DEATH against those who you see as being infidels is the rhetoric of terror.

In America we don't "fight to the death" against our political enemies. We meet at the table as equals, and work through our problems.

I hope Angelo will agree to the interview, and I hope I can do justice to the man. Maybe posting this isn't the right way to go about winning his trust, but it's an honest accounting for my original post. And as they say, that's the best policy.

UPDATE: I should point out that I made the changes in Angelo's post. It kind of reads like he played the game and I posted the results. I didn't want to mislead anybody.

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Smid Speaks

I promised I'd share a few quotes from John Smid, the Director of Love in Action. Instead I'll just share the first couple of paragraphs from my Flyer column that's coming out tomorrow.

How does God make a gay man straight? In 1997 John Smid the ex-gay Director for Love in Action, a homosexual conversion center located in Memphis, tried to explain this mystery to the Memphis Flyer. He said he would use non-Christian terms, to make it easier for secular types to understand.

"I'm looking at that wall and suddenly I say it's blue,” Smid said pointing at a yellow wall. “Someone else comes along and says, `No, it's gold. But I want to believe that wall is blue. Then God comes along and He says, `You're right, John, [that yellow wall] is blue. That's the help I need. God can help me make that [yellow] wall blue."

You don’t have to be a psyche major to recognize that Smid’s metaphor for gay conversion is the dictionary.com definition of delusional: “A false belief strongly held in spite of invalidating evidence.”

As you can see, the goal isn't to take sick people and make them well, it's to take perfectly normal people and fuck them up.


Monday, June 13, 2005

I may never sleep right again...

Psy-war, takin' it to the homies...

Please dear lord above, let this post I read at Whiskey Bar be nothing but a bad, bad, bad, bad dream.

Lincoln has developed a unique service which provides campaign managers and their staff with concise actionable information in order to understand their candidate's time and events, media planning, voter interest, issue positions and several other factors . . . This service is restricted and available only to select clients.

Billmon is having tinfoil visions--and in the Lincoln start-up ,I think I'm seeing what he sees. It's like a Frankenheimer flick. Wooguh!

We have a tiny start-up venture, controlled by persons unknown, that suddenly materializes in late 2003 doing "private equity" deals in the middle of a war zone, and then obtains a huge PR contract from the Pentagon, and then hires a bunch of unemployed GOP campaign operatives to execute that contract, and then is absorbed by a shadowy DC company that specializes in corporate and political detective work and that may have close ties to both the Republican Party and the intelligence community, which then is awarded an even bigger contract to produce even more Pentagon propaganda.

Now maybe that's just the way business is done in George Bush's government, but it doesn't make me any less creeped out by what I was able to dig up with a few online searches. You don't have to have too much of a taste for paranoid conspiracy theories to imagine scenarios in which such contracting relationships could prove very useful for the Bush administration and the GOP machine.

Smells like protest...


Now that's more like it!

From the Queer Action Committee:
DAY SIX PROTEST-PHOTO'S HERE
The largest crowd yet showed at LIA today, including a couple of Psychiatrists, and a former LIA client, who both spoke out against the practices of "Love in Action".

We will split up the protest tomorrow to infront and on the side of LIA. Because of the growing number of people attending, we want to cover both entrances. 8:30 is still the time to be there.

Professionals and victims speak out: this is what we talk about when we talk about gravitas!

GO GO GUYS!

UPDATE: I've been working on a column about LIA and have several John Smid quotes that make George W. Bush sound like Cicero by comparison. I'll post them later. All I'll say right now: : Dude, do we both see the same blue crayon?
Posted by Hello

Sunday, June 12, 2005

Alive and well

Heard from one of Zach's friends today. She went to the Church that sponsers Love in Action, and saw him there. He wasn't allowed to speak, but I hear he's looking healthy and together.

Love in Action

Speak out. EJ's done most of the work for you already.

Shit + Fan = Hey, look over there, is that Paris Hilton?

So the question is this: Will this freaking bombshell wake up the American media?



Ministers were told of need for Gulf war ‘excuse’
Michael Smith

MINISTERS were warned in July 2002 that Britain was committed to taking part in an American-led invasion of Iraq and they had no choice but to find a way of making it legal.

The warning, in a leaked Cabinet Office briefing paper, said Tony Blair had already agreed to back military action to get rid of Saddam Hussein at a summit at the Texas ranch of President George W Bush three months earlier.

The briefing paper, for participants at a meeting of Blair’s inner circle on July 23, 2002, said that since regime change was illegal it was “necessary to create the conditions” which would make it legal.

This was required because, even if ministers decided Britain should not take part in an invasion, the American military would be using British bases. This would automatically make Britain complicit in any illegal US action.

“US plans assume, as a minimum, the use of British bases in Cyprus and Diego Garcia,” the briefing paper warned. This meant that issues of legality “would arise virtually whatever option ministers choose with regard to UK participation”.

The paper was circulated to those present at the meeting, among whom were Blair, Geoff Hoon, then defence secretary, Jack Straw, the foreign secretary, and Sir Richard Dearlove, then chief of MI6. The full minutes of the meeting were published last month in The Sunday Times.

The document said the only way the allies could justify military action was to place Saddam Hussein in a position where he ignored or rejected a United Nations ultimatum ordering him to co-operate with the weapons inspectors. But it warned this would be difficult.

“It is just possible that an ultimatum could be cast in terms which Saddam would reject,” the document says. But if he accepted it and did not attack the allies, they would be “most unlikely” to obtain the legal justification they needed.

The suggestions that the allies use the UN to justify war contradicts claims by Blair and Bush, repeated during their Washington summit last week, that they turned to the UN in order to avoid having to go to war. The attack on Iraq finally began in March 2003.

The briefing paper is certain to add to the pressure, particularly on the American president, because of the damaging revelation that Bush and Blair agreed on regime change in April 2002 and then looked for a way to justify it.

There has been a growing storm of protest in America, created by last month’s publication of the minutes in The Sunday Times. A host of citizens, including many internet bloggers, have demanded to know why the Downing Street memo (often shortened to “the DSM” on websites) has been largely ignored by the US mainstream media.

The White House has declined to respond to a letter from 89 Democratic congressmen asking if it was true — as Dearlove told the July meeting — that “the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy” in Washington.

The Downing Street memo burst into the mainstream American media only last week after it was raised at a joint Bush-Blair press conference, forcing the prime minister to insist that “the facts were not fixed in any shape or form at all”.

John Conyers, the Democratic congressman who drafted the letter to Bush, has now written to Dearlove asking him to say whether or not it was accurate that he believed the intelligence was being “fixed” around the policy. He also asked the former MI6 chief precisely when Bush and Blair had agreed to invade Iraq and whether it is true they agreed to “manufacture” the UN ultimatum in order to justify the war.

He and other Democratic congressmen plan to hold their own inquiry this Thursday with witnesses including Joe Wilson, the American former ambassador who went to Niger to investigate claims that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium ore for its nuclear weapons programme.

Frustrated at the refusal by the White House to respond to their letter, the congressmen have set up a website — www.downingstreetmemo.com — to collect signatures on a petition demanding the same answers.

Conyers promised to deliver it to Bush once it reached 250,000 signatures. By Friday morning it already had more than 500,000 with as many as 1m expected to have been obtained when he delivers it to the White House on Thursday.

AfterDowningStreet.org, another website set up as a result of the memo, is calling for a congressional committee to consider whether Bush’s actions as depicted in the memo constitute grounds for impeachment.

It has been flooded with visits from people angry at what they see as media self-censorship in ignoring the memo. It claims to have attracted more than 1m hits a day.

Democrats.com, another website, even offered $1,000 (about £550) to any journalist who quizzed Bush about the memo’s contents, although the Reuters reporter who asked the question last Tuesday was not aware of the reward and has no intention of claiming it.

The complaints of media self-censorship have been backed up by the ombudsmen of The Washington Post, The New York Times and National Public Radio, who have questioned the lack of attention the minutes have received from their organisations.

BAP!

Junior go on Imus.

Junior say:

"I think perhaps Governor Dean sometimes gets a little excited at the mouth, and says things that are simply not true. It may reach a point where if he can't find a way to kind of control some of his comments, and temper his comments, it may get to the point where the party may need to look elsewhere for leadership, because he does not speak for me, and I know he does not speak for a majority of Democrats and I dare say Republicans in my home state."

Is Dean SUPPOSED to be speaking for the Republicans in Tennessee?

Is it wise for Junior to be making OPEN EFFING THREATS?

Why do I think he and a lot of other Democratic pols are in for a rude awakening?

Voters are tired of politically amorphus schmoos. They want to see the hard edges. They're hungry for a firebrand to lead the charge. They want somebody to represent the Democratic wing of the Democratic party and that person is CERTAINLY not Harold "Too busy eating coon to vote on the Federal budget" Ford.

It's not the dishonesty that bothers me Junior.
It's the stupidity.

And what about all those lobby-funded trips you made?

You want to know what Democrats WANT Junior? And no, I don't mean the guys you play quarters with on the hill, I mean VOTERS. They want leaders who serve them--not credit card companies, not lending institutions, not Medical manufacturers like Pegasus Airwave who hired your daddy's consulting firm to lobby for them.

Three little words:

Bitch

Ass

Punk.

Saturday, June 11, 2005

The Zen of Protest


A snapshot from my garden to meditate on

Some people took exception to my last post "The Tao of Protest"--well, at least to the line about how demonstrations are "a special kind of nothing." Silly people! Know you nothing of Wu Wei, a quality revered among Taoists? It means "active inactivity": a special kind of nothing. Wu Wei is essential to finding enlightenment. It's also a kind of selfless selfishness. But that's enough about the Tao, let's get Zen.

Q: When does a man become fully himself only when he's somebody else?

Okay, that's not a good koen because I can't answer it with a little dance, or a note on a flute. I've got to resort to messy, messy words.

A: When he's an actor.

The Autoegocrat of River City Mud fame upset some protesters at a planning session, both because of his manner, and his suggestions. One of the suggestions was that protesters need uniforms so they don't look like a bunch of hippies having a party.

Uniforms was a poor choice of words. It's got brownshirt connotations. Free spirited rebels HATE uniforms. But Autoegocrat--in spite of his poor choice of words--was entirely correct. The word he should have used is COSTUMES.

Effective protest is theater. Costumes must be chosen based on a rhetoric of style. Who is the audience and what do you want to communicate? Do you wish to reach a broad audience or a narrow one? Do you wish to stress the familiar or the foreign.

And who is the audience? Is it Zach, or the other kids? That would be sweet but I don't know how much it can accomplish. Is it the people of Love in Action? Or is your audience every right-thinking person--Gay and straight-- in Memphis, and parts beyond?

Are the costumes right? How about the stage? Are the sightlines good, or are some seats better than others?

And what's the name of your theater troupe? Is it inclusive, or exclusive?

As I have said before: if you are fighting a battle based on ideology, you will LOSE. But if you can make this show about how conversion therapy is a fraud that hurts people you can win. And you have a very attractive, effective prop in a certain website you don't want people linking to even though anybody with a computer can get there anyway.

Who is the protector and who is the protected?

I understand that people are doing more than just carrying signs. That was never really my point. But how are you doing all of the things you are doing?

UPDATE: A question has come up that I should answer:Why is an ideological fight a losing fight?

Because the faith-base ideology of the Christian right is irrational, that's why. And the minute there is a perceived attack on any article of faith they gain support from even more moderate quarters.

Posted by Hello

Friday, June 10, 2005

The Tao of Protests

A group of Memphians are going out every day and standing in front of Love in Action chanting and waving signs of protest.

Those people(bless them for their big hearts) aren't "doing nothing." They're doing a special kind of nothing that looks like something.

I'd hoped to write a long and thoughtful post about modern public demonstrations and how much (or little) they accomplish, but I don't really have the time or the energy.

But if YOU have the time to stand around chanting you have the time to write letters of introduction to church leaders all over Memphis asking to meet and discuss your cause, and how they might assist your cause. You have time to write letters to media outlets: local, regional, and national. You have the time to conduct e-mail campaigns that verge on spamming. You have time to find and work with lawyers who might want to look into civil rights violations. You have the time to research where funding comes from, and see if the money trail leads anywhere. You have time to write letters to every psychologist in Memphis to see if you can bring a coalition of mental healthcare providers together to denounce conversion therapy.

Time spent marching is often time wasted.

Instead of going out every day hit the streets once or twice a week when crowd levels can be maximized. During the week have people who would otherwise be marching go to high traffic areas and handbill to raise awareness of the targeted protests..

Maybe later I'll blog more about on this...

RUSHED at the moment.

Moo

This is really crappy news. And I've been on a taco bender.

When you sell your soul to corporations this is what you effing get.

Talking Points Theory

Josh has a post up at TPM that summons up ghosts of Empire Coffee. Here's what Dr. Marshall had to say:

This is interesting. You'll remember that a few months back three opponents of privatization went to one of the president's Bamboozlepalooza events and got tossed by someone who they were told was a Secret Service agent, even though they did nothing to disrupt the event in any way.

(It later emerged that the reason they were ejected was that they came in a car with a 'No Blood for Oil' bumper sticker.

To the best of my knowledge no one now disputes the fact that the three did nothing to merit ejection, even by the most draconian and Bush-true standards of president-fealty. And politicians of both parties in Colorado have condemned what happened.

The three involved as well as their supporters have been trying to find out since March just who the official was who ejected them, what the justification was and who he worked for.

At this point, the Secret Service has confirmed that the person in question did not work for them. And the White House has conceded that Mr. X was working as a volunteer for the White House. Both know the identity of the man. But both refuse to divulge the who he is or reveal any more about what happened.

Here's a piece in today's Rocky Mountain News on the latest. And here's more from the Denver Post.

The Colorado ejectees weren't acting up, they were merely sporting the wrong bumper sticker. Longtime readers will remember that Empire coffeehouse owner John Gasquet went on the record as saying that he was contacted by someone claiming to be a Fed and warned against posting anti-Bush signs.

Josh says they know the name of the fake Fed in Colorado but aren't ready to divulge.

Some time back I heard from a reliable source that Gasquet knew (or had a very firm idea) who made the calls to Empire, but wasn't ready to divulge.

I'm not saying that were talking about the same person but perhaps a connection.

Friday Twin Blogging


I'll be back to a regular blogging schedule soon. Posted by Hello

Thursday, June 09, 2005

On Vanity

Autoegocrat from River City Mud saw my last post. Seems he's been sensing the same disturbance in the force... from up close. He's blaming it on vanity and it sounds about right.

The Mudslinger attended a planning session for the Love In Action protest that sounds like a full on fustercluck. It seems the already doomed meeting was wrecked beyond repair by Autoegocrat's thoughtless phrasiology. No point in saying more, just read his post. It's a first hand account of what I was getting at earlier.

And Auto my man, someday we will all be judged not by the color of our language but by the content and the character.

On the other hand, as someone given to color and spirit, sometimes we're our own worst enemies.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

Unscrewing the midget

Hmmm. Strange rumblings in our corner of blogtopia. Rumblings are all they are at the moment as I'm piecing this narrative together from various ticks, shudders and twiches I've noticed in the online community.

The thrust of my theory is this. Somebody thinks all mentions of our wrongfully committed amigo Zach and all links to his website should vanish. Protests should continue quietly outside the media's greedy eye. This is to protect 16-year-old Zach. Sounds good and on the surface even I’m almost snookered by it.

PINK ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: all of this began with Zach’s post on his own website: a mournful missive to the universe wherein the teen claims a fascination with killing his mother and himself.

Who is the protector here, and who is the protected?

This fuse was torched in cyberspace, a region both vast and intimate where private thoughts are gifted to the public domain. The story has been told. The media is aware and Zach's troubling blog entry is still online for anyone to discover.

My dear old pappy once put his arm around his wayward son and with a tear in his eye he offered this caution, "Remember this dear child of mine: you can't unscrew a midget." As was the case with many of my pappy's sayings, I still don't understand what it means but somehow I think it applies.

Maybe I'm misreading the signs, and misunderstanding the colorful bird guts floating in my teacup. Maybe nobody's trying to kill the messengers before they arrive. All I know for a fact is this:

In this freaky, freaky time so curiously reminiscent of the Middle Ages The God infected are trying to assert authority over science. Lives are crushed in the conflict between reason and magic: diseases go uncured; the sane find themselves walled up in a madhouse. The stories that need telling most aren’t stories of ideology; we need human stories.

As I’m trying to figure out how this should be covered I’m tossing this out for debate.

** No midgets were harmed in the making of this post

If any little people were offended, I can’t help what my pappy says. And if you were being put into a center to turn tiny people tall through Christ, I’d be out there slugging for you as well!

Tuesday, June 07, 2005

Convert This!

I'm thrilled that our Memphis media is blog savvy enough to discover poor Zach. But is it much too much to ask them to forget "fair and balanced" and try to tell the truth? Since it doesn't seem like anybody who's touched this has paid a visit to the American Psychological Association's website, maybe I should quote what they have to say about programs like Love in Action:

The term "reparative therapy" refers to psychotherapy aimed at eliminating homosexual desires and is used by people who do not think homosexuality is one variation within human sexual orientation, but rather still believe homosexuality is a mental disorder. The most important fact about "reparative therapy," also sometimes known as "conversion" therapy, is that it is based on an understanding of homosexuality that has been rejected by all the major health and mental health professions. The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Counseling Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the National Association of School Psychologists, and the National Association of Social Workers, together representing more than 477,000 health and mental health professionals, have all taken the position that homosexuality is not a mental disorder and thus there is no need for a "cure."
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association and defining the standard of the field, does not include homosexuality as a mental disorder. All other major health professional organizations have supported the American Psychiatric Association in its declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder in 1973. Thus, the idea that homosexuality is a mental disorder or that the emergence of same-gender sexual desires among some adolescents is in any way abnormal or mentally unhealthy has no support among health and mental health professional organizations.

Despite the unanimity of the health and mental health professions on the normality of homosexuality, the idea of "reparative therapy" has recently been adopted by conservative organizations and aggressively promoted in the media. Because of this aggressive promotion of "reparative therapy," a number of the health and mental health professional organizations have recently issued public statements about "reparative therapy" as well.

The American Academy of Pediatrics in its policy statement on Homosexuality and Adolescence states: Confusion about sexual orientation is not unusual during adolescence. Counseling may be helpful for young people who are uncertain about their sexual orientation or for those who are uncertain about how to express their sexuality and might profit from an attempt at clarification through a counseling or psychotherapeutic initiative. Therapy directed specifically at changing sexual orientation is contraindicated, since it can provoke guilt and anxiety while having little or no potential for achieving changes in orientation

The American Counseling Association has adopted a resolution that states that it opposes portrayals of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth and adults as mentally ill due to their sexual orientation; and supports the dissemination of accurate information about sexual orientation, mental health, and appropriate interventions in order to counteract bias that is based on ignorance or unfounded beliefs about same-gender sexual orientation.

Further, at its 1999 World Conference, ACA adopted a position opposing the promotion of "reparative therapy" as a "cure" for individuals who are homosexual in its position statement on Psychiatric Treatment and Sexual Orientation states:The potential risks of "reparative therapy" are great, including depression, anxiety and self-destructive behavior, since therapist alignment with societal prejudices against homosexuality may reinforce self-hatred already experienced by the patient. Many patients who have undergone "reparative therapy" relate that they were inaccurately told that homosexuals are lonely, unhappy individuals who never achieve acceptance or satisfaction. The possibility that the person might achieve happiness and satisfying interpersonal relationships as a gay man or lesbian is not presented, nor are alternative approaches to dealing with the effects of societal stigmatization discussed

The American Psychological Association in its Resolution on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation, which is also endorsed by the National Association of School Psychologists, states:That the American Psychological Association opposes portrayals of lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth and adults as mentally ill due to their sexual orientation and supports the dissemination of accurate information about sexual orientation, and mental health, and appropriate interventions in order to counteract bias that is based in ignorance or unfounded beliefs about sexual orientation.

The National Association of Social Workers in its Policy Statement on Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Issues: endorses policies in both the public and private sectors that ensure nondiscrimination; that are sensitive to the health and mental health needs of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people; and that promote an understanding of lesbian, gay, and bisexual cultures. Social stigmatization of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people is widespread and is a primary motivating factor in leading some people to seek sexual orientation changes.

Sexual orientation conversion therapies assume that homosexual orientation is both pathological and freely chosen. No data demonstrate that reparative or conversion therapies are effective, and in fact they may be harmful

NASW believes social workers have the responsibility to clients to explain the prevailing knowledge concerning sexual orientation and the lack of data reporting positive outcomes with reparative therapy. NASW discourages social workers from providing treatments designed to change sexual orientation or from referring practitioners or programs that claim to do so.

As these statements make clear, health and mental health professional organizations do not support efforts to change young people's sexual orientation through "reparative therapy" and have raised serious concerns about its potential to do harm. Many of the professional associations listed in the Resources section at the end of this factsheet are able to provide helpful information and local contacts to assist school administrators, health and mental health professionals, educators, teachers, and parents in dealing with school controversies in their communities.

Transformational Ministries

Transformational ministry" is a term used to describe the use of religion to eliminate homosexual desires. While "reparative therapy" relies on secular approaches, "transformational ministry" takes the approach that "freedom from homosexuality is possible through repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord." While there is some diversity within the movement, most "transformational ministries" adhere to a belief that "upholds heterosexuality as God's creative intent for humanity, and subsequently views homosexual expression as outside God's will. The "transformational ministry" movement, which began in the early 1970s, has gained more visibility in the media recently through the efforts of Christian publishers and conservative political organizations.

The most important fact about "transformational ministry" is that its view of homosexuality is not representative of the views of all people of faith. Many deeply religious people and a number of religious congregations and denominations are supportive and accepting of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people and their right to be protected from the discriminatory acts of others. For example, the following organizations have endorsed passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation:

American Ethical Union, American Friends Service Committee, American Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress, Church of the Brethren, Church Women United, Dignity/USA, Episcopal Church, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Hadassah, WZOA, The Interfaith Alliance, Jewish Women International, National Council of Churches of Christ, USA, National Council of Jewish Women, North Georgia United Methodists, Presbyterian Church (USA), Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, Unitarian Universalist Association, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church, Women of Reform Judaism, Young Women's Christian Association

Although "transformational ministry" promotes the message that religious faith and acceptance of gay, lesbian, and bisexual sexuality are incompatible, that message is countered by the large number of outspoken clergy and people of faith who promote love and acceptance.

Long story short: According to the vast majority of experts (overwhelming even) conversion therapy is bullshit based on a philosophy of horseshit.

News at 10!

Better Dead than Gay

I think I'm going to be sick.

On Saturday I (and other local bloggers) posted about the poor kid in Bartlett who had the courage to (STRIKE THAT) made the mistake of telling his parents he was gay. They enrolled him in a fundiChristian camp to make gays "normal." My friend Morgan Jon Fox, a filmmaker and activist organized a protest against the group called (in that wonderful Orwellian way) Love In Action. Now Morgan has THIS to add:

FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF LOVE IN ACTION:
"I would rather you commit suicide than have you leave Love In Action wanting to return to the gay lifestyle. In a physical death you could still have a spiritual resurrection; whereas, returning to homosexuality you are yielding yourself to a spiritual death from which there is no recovery." --The Final Indoctrination from John Smid, Director, Love In Action (LIA)

OKAY, any COPS want to get in on this protest? This is the kind of Cult-think that resulted in a Kool-Aid party at Jonestown.

If an authority figure is offering suicide as an option---TO KIDS--- I think it's time somebody broke up the party.

AND what about all the Pro-life fundis out there who fretted over Terri Schiavo? Sounds like Love in Action might not be terribly Christian after all.

Gone Fishing

I'll be back to blogging soon. Busy at the moment.

Sunday, June 05, 2005

In on the act?

Okay. The best date I can find on Michael Hooks Jr.'s trip to Miami is "early Feburary." The Miami International Film Festival started on February 4. So that's the festival. He's got a story.

He says his trip to the festival was related to his blooming career as an actor in films and commercials.

That still seems a little odd.

Miami Intl. features U.S. and world cinema (drama and doc) with a special focus on Iberio-American films. It doesn't screen commercials and it didn't screen Hustle & Flow--the only film of note (and as far as I know the ONLY film) Hooks has been in. Can anybody out there name another?



Miami International isn't anything close to the industry-whore orgy of Sundance. I really can't see what Hooks' budding "acting career" and the Miami International Film Festival have in common. He isn't exactly "over the marquee" in Hustle. And let's face it, between Larry Flynt, Johnny Cash, and John Grisham pretty much all of Memphis has a "film career" now.

So maybe Hooks wanted to expose himself to Iberio-American film. Perhaps he was dying to see the "Spanish answer to the Purple Rose of Cairo." Because that's what Miami International is all about.

Saturday, June 04, 2005

Christians dig torture

What's happening to this Bartlett kid should be a crime.

It's psychological torture aimed at getting a "correct answer."

It's like forcing your child to have a sex change.

It's abuse.

It's effing abuse.

UPDATE: here's the nutshell: This kid told his parents he was gay. They have forced him into a Christian program to reform gays and make them "normal." It's psychological torture--- surgery on the soul. Like I said, it's a forced sex change. He's written long posts about it--some quite scary. He's included long lits of rules and the Bible verses the rules are based on.

This is how Columbines happen. Go read it all--- start with the "Thanks" post, and move down from there. Get angry. Give the guy love and support. Sounds like he could use some. And here's an excerpt from his last post:

Thanks. Thank you for all of the comments and messages, they mean a lot. really. I was shocked to see all of this... of course I haven't been on a computer, phone, nor have I seen any friends in a week almost-- Soon. Soon, this will be all over. My mother has said the worst things to me for three days straight... three days. I went numb. That's the only way I can get through this. I agree, if you're thinking that these posts might be dramatized.. but the proof of the programs ideas are sitting in the rules. I pray this blows over. I can't take this... noone can... not really, this kind of thing tears you apart emotionally. To introduce THIS subject... I'm not a suicidal person... really I'm not.. I think it's stupid - really. But.. I can't help it, no im not going to commit suicide, all I can think about is killing my mother and myself. It's so horrible. This is what it's doing to me... I have this horrible feeling all of the time... I wish this on no person... I'm so satisfied--happy's too strong of a word the state I'm in-- that everyone's taking the time to email and write letters in complaint to these people. I dont know if it will do anything, but if something did happen it would be -- awesome.

Update on the Update: Hey everybody visiting from all over the net. Please link this on your site if you have one. We need to show this kid that his parents are two people---and the world is large.

Friday, June 03, 2005

Roll 'em

What film festival was Michal Hooks attending in Miami when he met FBI worm Tim Willis on the docks?

Was Hooks attending the Gay and Lesbian Film Festival from April 22-May 1? Or maybe The Miami International Festival Feb 4-13. Maybe the Latin Festival April 15-24, or the Jewish Festival March 19-27. The Miami Short Film Festival hasn't happened yet, nor has the Brazillian Film Festival or the American Black Film Festival.

Anybody got the date Hooks met Willis in Miami?

Thursday, June 02, 2005

Gray Matters

For the first time I have serious problems with Leon Gray's commentary on AM 680.

Seems Leon wouldn't have minded if the Tennessee 7 were busted taking bribes from a "real business," (pie in the effing sky) but he's upset that federal money was used to pay federal agents to catch crooks who will be supported by taxpayer money in a federal prison.

What the ever loving fuck? The agents get paid if they catch a crook or not. Taxpayers fund prisons already. Why? To house fucking crooks, that's why.

What's your problem here Leon? Do you want corrupt leaders? Cops that don't earn their keep?

Me, I want Tom DeLay to get the same treatment. But it makes me no less happy to see some lesser scum go down the tube.

As it happens the FBI couldn't have moved on any of the fish they caught if they didn't have significant evidence that said fish were bad actors. There was pre-existing (though not conviction worthy) evidence. Without pre-existing reasons for moving the sting would be entrapment.

So come on Leon. I like your stuff a lot, but here you're both uninformed and intellectually dishonest.

It really sounds like you'd rather have crooks in power. Why?

You sound like Mr. Liddy who had the gall to dis Deep Throat.

This is bad Leon.

Awful.

Really awful.

Undercover work is basic to law enforcement. We use stings to catch bigtime drug dealers--- are our white collar criminals and political villians too good to be treated like common thieves?

I don't think so.

Damn I wish I had time to write---- because as much as I've praised you I'd like to tear you a new one. And I'd like to do so in a thoughtful way. Sadly all I can do is gag and wonder in print--- does anybody else read your copy?

UPDATE: Some e-mailers think I'm being too hard on Leon. Too bad. besides, I'll be on his side again tomorrow. He's really good on most issues---really stupid on this one. We're all really stupid on something.

Anytime (and just about anyhow) you can catch the people who spend our tax dollars and plan the future of our city, state and country selling their influence it's a good thing. Don't get all up in the gift horse's grill.

Whachoo talkin' 'bout Willis: take 2

No time for details but I will say this: any news outlet that says Tim Willis is a filmmaker or in the film industry is pushing reality to the breaking point.

Was he involved in Hustle & Flow? Kinda sorta. He was trying to push for some product placement in the film. He met John Singleton though--barring comment from Singleton-- it's hard to know if any serious relationship was formed anywhere other than in li'l Timmy's mind. But he was inspired...

Willis--without even the basic understanding of how a film is made--wrote a screenplay called Street Life that he then set out to film much in the same way that I---a math moron---might buy a hammer and try to build a skyscraper. Some of the filming was done in the Pembroke Square offices of Ecycle Management that Tim (a sho-nuff part of the no-nuff company) called, "his office."

Sadly I can't relate much more here and now other than to say that in addition to being a convicted felon he sounds like a schemer and a schmuck.

If he helped catch some crooks, right on. But the media needs to get its story straight.

I've got 100-pages of gook on my desk top. I'm not a novelist.
I know Craig Brewer---hugged his neck this afternoon and spent time on the Hustle & Flow set. I handed an actor a bottle of water. I was not involved in the making of Hustle & Flow.

May we call them Nazis now?

From Americablog:

Bush's "Snowflake" adoption program discriminates on basis of religion, sexual orientation
by John in DC - 6/2/2005 10:20:00 AM

I'm sorry, but how is it legal that this adoption program discriminates on the basis of religion? (Read the excerpt from the NYT article below.)
It's disgusting that they allow anti-gay discrimination too, of course, but religious discrimination is in the civil rights act. And this is not a church, it's an adoption agency. So how do they permit discrimination? Do they permit discrimination based on race too? You know, in case I don't want any of those dark folks adopting my sperm child. And would a court of law be forced to endorse religious or race based discrimination if the adoption agency refused to follow through on the donors racist or bigoted views?

Couples adopting or donating Snowflakes embryos are mostly Christian, and most embryo donors are white, Ms. Maze said. Some families are Roman Catholic, even though the church has historically opposed in vitro fertilization.
Couples must agree to adoption-like procedures: receiving families are screened and must undergo counseling, and Snowflakes allows donating and receiving families to designate criteria for each other, meet and maintain contact after birth. Adopting couples must agree not to abort any embryos.
Those conditions were fine with Bob and Angie Deacon of Virginia Beach, Va., who donated their 13 embryos after having twins and being discouraged from another pregnancy by a doctor. "With another program, to be honest with you, they could have been adopted by lesbian parents, and I'm totally against that," said Mr. Deacon, 35.
It took two and a half years to bring themselves to fill out the papers. On their forms, they said the adopting family must be conservative Christians and, ideally, include a stay-at-home mother.
Law or no law, these people were at the White House. AT THE WHITE HOUSE, at the invitation of the president. The president wanted this to be THE MODEL for the country - religious-based (and who knows, race-based?) discrimination as the model for the entire country.
So again, I ask the question - do they permit discrimination based on race? Against Latinos? Blacks? Irish? Muslims?
PS And how did the NYT totally miss this incredible aspect of their own story? Did NO editor read this and go "holy shit"? No follow up with the Snowflake folks about the legality of doing this, the morality of doing this, and whether they permit discrimination in other categories?

Wednesday, June 01, 2005

Whatchoo talkin' 'bout Willis?

Anybody know how Tim Willis is involved in the film industry? A friend called this afternoon and mentioned that he wasn't listes in the Internet Movie Database (which is pretty dang comprehensive) and he's not listed in the credits for Hustle & Flow.

But his answering machine says he's "on location."

Doing what? I do a little entertainment writing and have NO idea how this guy is involved in filmmaking.

At first I thought, "well, he's just under the radar," there's nothing to this. But now Hooks is saying he was in Florida because of HIS acting career? WTF?

UPDATE:

Okay, so now we know something. Willis was shooting a TV pilot with D'Army Baily in offices being rented by the FBI. Makes perfect sense.

Was Willis shooting a real TV pilot for a real paying production company or was he filming a vanity project on government-funded location?

Yeah, I know this is real eye off the ball stuff, but I'm easily distracted.

Sympathy for the Dumbass

Leon Gray, the even-keeled voice of progressive talk radio in Memphis, once looked at me and grinned from ear to ear. It was a paradoxical grin, completely sad, but entirely self-amused. It was the kind of grin you might see on a suicidal circus freak musing on his own deformity “What do you do with John Ford,” he asked helplessly. “He’s like something out of a folk story.”

Leon was right. Ford’s over-the-top antics have often worked in his favor. He never lived in district 29, or any other voting district for that matter. He was a creature of the hyperreal. The cartoonishness made him no better, but easier to digest: a replica of the real deal. As the French economist turned philosopher Jean Baudrillard might suggest that made him all the more powerful and impossible to know. He became Buffalo John: a legend. And legends are never "true." So nothing they say about John Ford can be "true," can it?

That’s the bitch of it all. That, a record (deserved or un) of solid constituent services, and the rule of Habeas Blingis kept the man in office. A less colorful figure might have flamed out years ago.

There are yahoos in Blogtopia (and in The Flyer parking lot, I understand) crying “hypocrisy” when Ford is Liberally flogged and simultaneously begging for the emergence of Pro-Forders they can subsequently (and easily) (and rightfully) dismantle. It’s difficult for me to do anything more than sit on the fence and watch it all play out.

I’ve heard a few grumbles among nervous lefties who despise Ford personally but will miss his “reliably progressive” voting record. As far as I’m concerned there’s nothing reliably progressive about a man who carries water for deadbeat serial-dads. But there are a few good bites in John Ford’s rotten bushel and they should be savored even as tar and feathers are applied. Like my buddy Bill says, “The evil men do lives after them, the good is oft interred with their bones.” So let us now praise Buffalo John for all the good things he’s done—and bring on the dirt! I feel like a long-time herpes sufferer on the day scientists announce a cure.

Now that I have fulfilled my online obligation to equivocate both sides against the middle I will conclude with the strongest curse in the South:

Bless his heart.

No red meat. Just tofu. Sorry.


John Ford's Biggest Crime

Why did John Ford stay in the Senate instead of hitting the revolving door? If he'd gotten out several years ago he could have used his contacts and his influence. He could have pulled all the same levers and been one heck of a high priced lobbist. His work for Doral would have been on the up and up.

People in politics for the money get in, build up their contacts, get out--- and make their fortune off the contacts. That's what we talk about when we talk about the "revolving door."

John Ford's biggest crime: not getting out while the getting was good.

Kurita Kurita

Want to see my take on Ros Kurita's visit to Memphis? Click the headline.

Disgusting

Thanks to Ken for dropping this into my in-box:

"A Cover-Up as Shameful as Tillman's Death

May 31, 2005 –- Once again it has taken grieving relatives to point out that the Bush administration will exploit even a heroic death for its own partisan purposes.

As with the widows of Sept. 11 who demanded that our obfuscating leaders investigate what went wrong on that terrible day, or the wounded Army Pfc. Jessica Lynch, who resisted efforts to make her into some kind of Rambo figure, so relatives of late NFL star Pat Tillman are demanding to know why their celebrated war hero son's death in 2004 was exploited for public relations purposes by the U.S. military and the administration.

"They blew up their poster boy," Tillman's father, Patrick, a San Jose lawyer, told the Washington Post last week. He joined his former wife to demand accountability for the latest military cover-up to happen on Commander in Chief Bush's watch. High-ranking Army officials, he said, told "outright lies."

"After it happened, all the people in positions of authority went out of their way to script this," Tillman said. "They purposely interfered with the investigation …. I think they thought they could control it, and they realized that their recruiting efforts were going to go to hell in a handbasket if the truth about his death got out."

A devastating series of investigations and Post stories has shown that the Army's command structure was eager to cover up the embarrassing truth: that Pat Tillman, who turned down a $3.6-million contract with the Arizona Cardinals to join the Army Rangers after 9/11, was accidentally killed by his fellow Rangers while on patrol in Afghanistan a year ago.

Last spring, after months of increasingly damaging reports exposing the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and cover-up, the administration found some public relations relief in the sad, patriotic tale of a man who spurned fame and fortune to make "the ultimate sacrifice in the war on terror," in the words of a White House spokesman at the time. A nationally televised memorial service and a Silver Star commendation cemented Tillman's place as the nation's first war hero since the story of Lynch's capture and phony details of her rescue were foisted on the public in 2003.

Now, thanks to the reporting of the Post and the fury of Tillman's parents, we know that the military's top commanders were covering up the truth to protect their image, and that of the Bush administration's costly and deadly "nation-building" exercises in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Although "soldiers on the scene said they were immediately sure Tillman was killed by a barrage of American bullets," according to the Post, and "a new Army report on the death shows that top Army officials, including the theater commander, Gen. John P. Abizaid, were told that Tillman's death was fratricide days before the service," Army officials decided not to inform Tillman's family or the public until weeks after the memorial. And even then, they provided no details and answered no questions, saying only that friendly fire "probably" killed Tillman.

"The fact that he was the ultimate team player and he watched his own men kill him is absolutely heartbreaking and tragic," Tillman's mother, Mary, told the Post. "The fact that they lied about it afterward is disgusting."

The soldiers on the ground said they burned Tillman's bullet-riddled uniform and body armor, the Post reported, because they considered them a biohazard, and because, as one said, "we knew at the time, based on taking the pictures and walking around it, it was a fratricide…. so we weren't thinking about proof or anything."

So, given all this, why has nobody high in the Army chain of command, such as Abizaid, been held accountable for this cover-up?

Did President Bush know about it? If not, why not? After all, this was the most prominent soldier to die since Bush took office four years earlier, a prize recruit for his controversial spate of foreign invasions.

In any case, the White House has refrained from making any public apologies for the cover-up. Indeed, Mary Tillman said she was particularly offended that even after the facts were known, Bush exploited her son's death with a message played before an Arizona Cardinal game last fall before the election.

"Maybe lying's not a big deal anymore," Patrick Tillman said. "Pat's dead, and this isn't going to bring him back. But these guys should have been held up to scrutiny, right up the chain of command, and no one has."

For the Tillmans, as with Pfc. Lynch and the 9/11 widows, the path to true patriotism means confronting your government when it lies. "

This & That

Blogging may be light this week but I'll try to post at least once a day.

Darrell Phillips has video of John Ford's lawyer explianing why his client isn't violent: "He didn't punch out Andy Wise."

Somebody talked to Tim Willis who said he had NOTHING to do with John Ford and that the media was getting it all wrong. Whaaaaaaaaaaaa?

Darrell also has a post up explaining how (and to some degree) why these kinds of arrests are usually staggered. As I've suggested already, nothing lubricates the lips like a bunch of high profile arrests and we can expect more soon enough.

So go visit DP again today.

Followers